Sunday, November 23, 2008

A few pictures that tell an important story... click on the graphs to see the whole thing





to summarize:

  • investors are sitting on a LOT of cash-- historical highs
  • valuations are at 30 year lows while dividend yields are at their highs (albeit with more than a few US companies cutting dividends of late)
  • junk bond credit spreads are also at 30 year highs
is capitulation/a market bottom looming? If I had to guess, I would it will come over the next 6 months or so.

Happy bargain hunting!


Saturday, November 22, 2008

Have a look at USG

Read this article first.

Q&A with Buffet-- Part I, II and III

Part I



Part II



Part III


Disclaimer: my wife and I own shares in USG, USB and COP

David Dreman's Forbes article

read it here

More BAM: cash flow analysis

from Desjardins Securities: read it here

BAM is one of my favourite longterm investments: wide moat real estate (both residential and commercial), "green" power generation assets along with prolific management fees, keeps the cash coming in. 17% of shares are insider owned. Capital allocation is carefully and intelligently considered: read CEO Bruce Flatt's comments regarding that topic in the Q3 2008 conference call transcript.

I have a low ball bid in for $10/share (below book value of approx $11/share!).

l

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

A couple of opportunities to watch for...

I don't have time to fully analyze these businesses for you now but 3 amazing values have come up today:

NOK Nokia- cash rich, market share hogging, well managed with a 6%+ yield etc etc trading at $13 and change. One of the few free thinking analysts, Vitaliy Katnelson, has a brief overview of the bull case for Nokia here.

LUK Keucadia National Corp- 28% increase in book value/year since 1968! trading at 1998 values $17/share. There's an analysis of some of LUK's portfolio here.

BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway-- grazing $3000/share, also trading at 2005 levels. I don't think I need to say more than that about this one.

I'd study them all.

l

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Bill Miller's Q3 letter

Whether you have respect for him as an investor or not, I think you'll benefit from reading this extremely insightful letter here.

Wait until Santa does his thing

my comment: the article below is immoderate to say the least and I don't agree with a few things he says; however, there's a few nuggets of truth in there:

  • tax loss selling is likely to produce even better buying opportunities in quality companies next month
  • commodities could go down even further than they have and the recovery time will be difficult or impossible to predict, even if you believe that we are in the midst of a long term secular bull market in commodities


Tax-loss selling for 2008 will be the rule the next eight weeks.

Story By Rob Cornelius

Money on the sidelines isn't coming back to the market. Don't expect the cavalry to show up and save us. Money that is out of the market either vaporized as losses, is in "safe" investments, such as U.S. government securities, or capitalizing one of these banks that is begging for deposits.

Preserving capital is critical. Nobody is feeling greedy yet.

Tax-loss selling for 2008 will be the rule the next eight weeks. Investors will sell their losers (and, boy, do we have a bunch of those) to make up for their gains. The pressure on stock prices should continue to be downward. Hedge-fund and mutual-fund redemptions will happen before year's end as well.

Carryover losses will be awesome. Investors have seemed to fear a Barack Obama presidency, and the last 1,500 points of Dow fall appear correlated to his rise in the polls. Some will sell to incur taxable losses; others who have huge assets are trying to get rid of them now to avoid changes in tax laws.

Retirement Plan Disasters

Pensions, charities and endowments will continue to hide behind terms like "unrecoverable losses." Read the daily newspapers and you see that term come up. That simply means losses they were forced to take by selling a devalued asset. There still are plenty more on the books that will have to be taken eventually. Understand that many of those organizations' stocks now need to go up 100 percent to be where they were a few months ago: If you are down 50 percent, you have to go up 100 percent to be even.

As S&P and Moody's do their jobs in coming months, more corporate bonds will be downgraded. More companies adjust earnings estimates down. When they drop below certain ratings thresholds, pension funds will be forced to sell them at market, cascading still further "unrecoverable" losses.

Pension funds were and are handicapped by being slow-moving, committee-driven animals -- late to bull markets and slow to evacuate bad ones. Not active, but reactive. And they are paying for it.

While state pensions have embarrassed all over the country, their corporate or private brethren may be worse; the former have the ability to raise shortfalls via taxes or bigger employee deductions. Ask U.S. Steel or the UMWA where their pension plans will be in a year. They are based on increasing share prices of the underlying company or adding more jobs/members. Neither is happening.

The Federal Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. is seriously short of money, and a couple of good-sized corporate failures could deplete its kitty. It is like the FDIC for pension plans -- the insurance of last resort.

Someone will be made to take responsibility. In 2010 or 2012, this will be a political tool for un-electing state treasurers or anyone else vaguely responsible of either party.

The only upside of all this may be the fact that inflation, for the short term, is dead. Deflation is the word, as everything shrinks in value, be it homes or tons of coal or barrels of oil. But that said, I can never imagine a scenario when governments reverse cost-of-living-increases to those on the dole. They seem to have little self-interest in shrinkage.

People in many non-Roth IRAs and employee savings plans of all sorts are trapped. Some plans have no way to become un-invested other than money markets, which were shown to be potentially deadly in recent months. Worse still, you have no way to go short or bet against the markets. No sector has been safe for the last 90 days.

For those who are still mad at people who short stocks, it was pension funds that got rich as part of that process. To short a stock, some other investor must loan it to you. In most cases, it was big pensions, such as CALPERS loaning you those shares of Citibank and collecting margin interest on the loan. Like prostitution, it was a mutual agreement of two parties -- one of whom never really expected Citi to fall to $12.

Who Else Can We Blame?

Illegal immigrants and their contributions to the real estate mess will be brought to the forefront to create scapegoats. National reporting states that as many as 5 million home mortgages may have been extended to illegal aliens, many of whom are in worse financial straits than Americans. In big, round numbers, and knowing that more illegals bought more homes in western states (where they are more expensive), say banks lose an average of $100,000 on each of those transactions. You're looking at a loss just there of $500 billion. Maybe that's overstating a dollar number, but protectionism and assessing blame tend to be big in economic disasters.

I cited "losers" and "poor people" as root causes of this crisis when I first started writing about it here on Aug. 9, 2007. That said, they were rational actors empowered by government to take what they knew they couldn't afford. When government told lenders to loosen standards so that anyone who could fog a mirror got a mortgage, these folks took advantage. Having everyone equal may be fine in a co-ed game of soccer among first-graders with no one keeping score. But in real life, some of you are richer/smarter/faster and get more playing time or score more goals. The market should reward that. Not all our children can be above average.

U.S. Dollar is Strong

U.S. Bank government guarantees are bringing every dollar here to federally backed investments. This strengthens our dollar and weakens foreign markets' currencies. The eventual inflection point will be when the rest of the world loses faith in the Treasury to pay back and our rates to borrow suddenly skyrocket. That's when inflation should return. At this point, the best course of action may be to sell as much new debt as possible while rates are super low. As other nations cut interest rates to spur their own economies, the flight to U.S. dollars should intensify further.

Thank God the U.S. didn't make many loans to developing countries, whose currencies are crashing. Typical European banks may have those loans filling 20 percent of their books; the U.S. averages 4 percent. Crashing currencies make it harder to pay back your loans.

The idea of rising interest rates at the same time as deflation is pretty unique in economic history. No one is really sure how to model this crisis after anything else except maybe the American Panic of 1873.

Hard Assets Soften

Cheap energy is a terrible sign for growth and the world economy.

Oil has more room to contract in price, as demand will slow further. The only thing keeping American refiners open is the fact that they can still make money on the middle distillates they refine (heating oil, diesel and aviation gasoline). They ship a lot of those to Europe. They are losing on auto gasolines right now. Once you see the diesel price in West Virginia slim down to maybe a 50-cent premium over regular gasoline, you'll know the refiners are in real trouble.

Low energy prices will destroy whatever progress has been made on alternative energy. Well-capitalized companies will do well as steel cheapens for massive windmills, but most of the solar guys were selling at ridiculous price/earnings multiples.

Ethanol is also dead if wholesale gasoline stays under $2 a gallon. Farmers may shift from corn to soybeans next spring for the sake of profits. Short term, alternative energy will expand only as a direct result of government handouts.

Gold/silver .... paper versus reality. Go to eBay. While gold that trades in the markets is less than $700, you see one-ounce gold coins selling for a three-digit premium to that at $850 or more. The percentage gap is still greater for silver and platinum.

People are hoarding gold and extra bullets it would seem. Central banks are trying to raise U.S. dollars and appear to be dumping physical gold while they can, depressing price. Price is now dropping enough to make mining unprofitable for not just gold but also many of the non-precious metals, such as copper and nickel.

Stop Whining, Learn

Great reads/blogs to scare yourself straight on this topic: calculatedrisk.blogspot.com, globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com, nakedcapitalism.blogspot.com ... and pay attention anytime "Dr. Doom" Nouriel Roubini or Oppenheimer analyst Meredith Whitney show up anywhere. Billionaire genius Mark Cuban at blogmaverick.com has been smart and full of good ideas, albeit with no sense of investment timing at all. All seem pretty sure our financial system isn't done with its turn in the spanking machine.


Rob Cornelius of Parkersburg follows energy and the markets for The State Journal.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Gurus falling down

Need a Real Sponsor here

Millions of Americans are reeling from investment losses this year.

For many, the financial cost of the red ink is only part of the misery. They're also kicking themselves for the losses.

Maybe you feel you invested too much. Maybe you feel you should have invested in different assets.

This may prove scant consolation, but it is worth noting: The best of the best have done no better. So go easy on yourself.

This has been Wall Street's year of the fallen idols.

[Bill Miller]

Bill Miller

Marty Whitman, the legendary septuagenarian who co-manages Third Avenue Value, has seen crises come and go. There are few you could trust more in a panic. But his fund has almost halved this year. Bill Miller, the famous manager at Legg Mason Value, has fallen by nearly 60%. And that's not even the worst of it. Miller's more flexible, go-anywhere fund, Legg Mason Opportunity Trust, is down by two-thirds since the start of the year.

Ron Muhlenkamp at Muhlenkamp, Wally Weitz at Hickory, Manu Daftary at Quaker Strategic Growth, Richie Freeman at Legg Mason Partners Aggressive Growth, Ken Heebner at CGM Focus, Christopher Davis and Kenneth Feinberg at Davis New York Venture Fund, Will Danoff at Fidelity Contrafund, Saul Pannell at Hartford Capital Appreciation: They've all lost about 40% or more. Some have nearly halved.

It is a shocking bloodbath. These are managers with some of the highest reputations on Wall Street. They have beaten the Street over many years, even decades. And even they got shellacked.

What chance did you have?

Even most of those who anticipated a crash got pummeled. Bob Rodriguez at FPA Capital has been very bearish for years, and was holding large amounts of cash in the fund. But he's still down 36%.

The picture for Warren Buffett looks somewhat better, although he swung from $3 billion investment profits to $1.4 billion losses in the first nine months of the year, while net earnings more than halved. Shares in Berkshire Hathaway have fallen about 31% since Jan. 1.

Those who look good include John Hussman at Hussman Strategic Total Return, who is down just a few percent. And Jeremy Grantham at GMO, who predicted much of the meltdown. His GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund, an institutional fund that has a pretty free rein on what to hold and what to avoid, has still lost 11% so far this year.

There are three long-term lessons here for ordinary investors.

The first is that if the smartest and best fund managers can't successfully anticipate a crash with any degree of confidence, you can't either. Time spent trying is time wasted.

The smart money rarely spends much time very bearish, and with good reason. In practice it is almost impossible to predict a crash. And even if you are right about the direction, you will probably get the timing wrong. That may end up compounding your losses instead of preventing them.

John Hussman is among very few who have gotten this one right. I know at least two superstar managers who correctly anticipated a blow out, and moved heavily into cash… in the fall of 2006, a year too soon. Markets soared instead.

I also know of at least one portfolio manager who's been predicting the U.S. credit implosion for at least seven years.

Prudent Bear has been betting on falling shares (and rising gold) for a long time. It's finally getting its reward: It's up about 37% so far this year. But investors actually lost money between 2003 and the end of 2007, while the rest of Wall Street rose 70%.

And remember that investing is a long-term game. This has been the worst financial bloodbath since 1929. Yet Ken Heebner is still up more than fivefold over the past ten years, even after factoring in this year's carnage. Mr. Daftary has more than doubled investor's money. Many others are up 50% or more over that time.

The best an investor can do is to look for value, prefer unfashionable assets over fashionable ones, and avoid chasing past performance.

As previously observed here, everything has now fallen. Inflation-protected government bonds. Munis. Gold stocks. The whole shebang. Eighteen months ago, every single asset class was expensive. Today it's possible that almost every single asset class – with the possible exception of regular Treasurys - is cheap.

Write to Brett Arends at brett.arends@wsj.com

Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

www.djreprints.com

Monday, November 10, 2008

New stock to study: Mohawk Industries MHK



Mohawk Industries is a producer and distributor of residential and commercial flooring including carpet, ceramic and porcelain tile, hardwood, laminate and home textiles including area rugs. They also distribute resilient (vinyl) and vinyl composition tile (VCT) flooring through a partnership with Congoleum.

Mohawk and Shaw (owned by Berkshire) are the 2 largest floor covering manufacturers in the world-- this represents a near duopoly: together they own 46% of market share.

MHK was founded 130 years ago. Its distribution system is much admired in the industry. It has over 30,000 regular customers (mostly specialty stores), none representing more than 5% of the total revenues. Market Cap approx. 2.5 B. Share price is down 53% from 52 week highs.

Bull Case:

  • duopoly and global footprint
  • boring business with a slow rate of change
  • very easy business to understand
  • Management is shareholder oriented and communicates very clearly in all reports
  • high insider ownership 18% of the company's outstanding shares are owned by the CEO
  • one director bought about $7 M worth of stock at $69/share in late Aug '08
  • value gurus have large stakes: Berkowitz, Ruane Cunniff and Wallace Weitz
  • meets criteria for Graham stock: P/E 4.1 P/B 0.5 Current Ratio > 2, 5y EPS Growth Rate > 3, EV/EBIDTA is only 5.
  • generated 371 M of cash flow in the first 9 months of 2008, actively paid down 271 M of a total of 2 B of debt. D:E is 0.47 well below industry average of 0.61.
  • no debt matures until 2011
  • Q3 results distorted by a quirky accounting rule that forced the company to write down a large non-cash charge v.s. goodwill (1.2 B) and tax deferral charges (0.25 B) triggered by the rapid and steep decline in MHK's share price.
  • 60% of revenue is derived from renovations and remodelling, not new builds.
  • MHK has been able to raise prices recently despite lower input costs from the drop in petrochemical prices which should help boost margins in the intermediate term
  • Gurufocus backtested business predictability index rates MHK's 10 year financials at 4.5/5 stars.
Bear Case:

  • 13.5% of outstanding shares have been sold short. The short sellers are probably right-- the share price is going to drop even further
  • there is a debt covenant on one of the LOCs that stipulates that the debt:equity ratio must stay below 0.6 or the company will be forced to liquidate assets at less than favourable terms
  • nat gas/oil prices (2/3 of costs of goods sold) are likely to rise again with the economic recovery and impact margins adversely
  • there is no end in site for the housing bubble implosion. There is at least 8 months of new home inventory to clear before builders start to significantly increase demand for MHK's products and its very possible that the slowdown could drag on longer than expected.
  • no dividend despite great and predictable cash flows!

This company is definitely worth further study. It would clearly be a long term investment 18 months to 3 years+. It is fundamentally cheap now; however, it's clear that the share price has further to drop. I would be interested at <$30/share and I would buy in small increments over the next 18 months, watching the company's liquidity very carefully. Housing in NA and Europe will recover one day-- I'm not sure when. The stock will likely rocket up (if the company survives, that is) 6 months or so before the recovery is obvious just because that's how the market works. With these kind of investments you need to commit during the times of maximum uncertainty, unfortunately.

Bedtime reading for China bulls and Gold-bugs

Globe and Mail's Avner Mandelman

Sunday, November 9, 2008

A little brain damage might make you a better investor...

I'm hopeful that this is true because just yesterday I got caught by a left hook in my MMA class straight in the nose.

This article describes the psychological underpinnings that hold us back from making asymmetrically rewarding bets after we have made recent losses (realized or not). Patients with traumatic brain injuries often have disordered limbic-cognitive function which prevents them from being fearful bettors, even when they probably should be.

l

Friday, November 7, 2008

BAM-- Technical Knock out from the G&M

My confidence in the management and position of this company continues to grow. In an awful environment for financing and raising capital, they continue to outperform all their competitors.

I'll buy at <$20 with conviction. I'm also very interested in some of the preferred offerings.


The Canadian Press
November 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM EST
TORONTO — Brookfield Asset Management Inc., formerly known as Brascan, reported Friday a sharply higher net profit and rising revenue.
Its third-quarter net profit was $171-million (U.S.), or 27 cents a share, up from earnings of $93-million, or 13 cents for the same 2007 period.
Overall revenue jumped to just under $1.3-billion from $980-million, said the company, which reports in U.S. dollars.
In breaking down its quarterly results, Brookfield said increases in operating cash flows were offset by higher non-cash charges, including depreciation on assets bought since the 2007 second quarter.


“Our operating performance in the quarter reflected the durability of our cash flows, most of which are supported by long-term contractual arrangements with credit-worthy counterparties, the high quality of our asset base and operating platforms, and the stability of our long duration investment grade capitalization,” said Bruce Flatt, the company's senior managing partner.
“In the last few months we increased our overall cash holdings and liquidity to more than $3.5-billion, most of that at the Brookfield corporate level.”
“This is one of the highest levels of liquidity we have ever held, but given uncertainty in the markets we want to be prepared for the unknowns, and opportunities which may present themselves in this environment.”
Mr. Flatt said although Brookfield is “exercising caution during these turbulent times, and preserving a high level of liquidity, we are exploring a number of potential opportunities to expand our operating platforms and create additional shareholder value.”
Brookfield Asset Management is focused on property, power and infrastructure assets and has about $90-billion of assets under management.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Along the same lines


Since Buffett is buying up a railroad--- he now owns 18% of Burlington North-- maybe you can too.

GSH Guangshen Railway serves the Pearl River Delta in mainland China. It has miniscule debt for a railroad (Debt to capital ratio 13%) and is a predominately commuter railroad (i.e. less sensitive to economic cycles). It has a wide economic moat simply because the Chinese government will not allow competition to arise. It owns the only railway connecting HK and mainland China to boot. EV/EBIDTA is 14, comparable to NA railways. Dividend is 3% yield. P/B x P/E is 10.

I would definitely not buy GSH now. Morningstar has calculated a FMV of $28/share. I would be interested in buying shares if it dropped during a market scare to $15/share or less.

Another analysis here.

Asia rising

I've become much more interested in the Asia investment arena lately, precisely because almost everyone else is running away from it.

As I've mentioned before, I still believe that the best way to invest in overseas markets is to buy global companies based in the US. Many of the components of the DOW 30 get more than 50% of their revenue offshore. With that you get access to a lot of information and at least some accountability (yes, I know the banks and brokers have let us down, but compare it to the skulduggery that goes on in many other countries and it looks bland). My reservation about investing in these areas is that it is so difficult to do what Phil Fisher called "scuttlebutt" (getting as much information in addition to the financial reports as you can to give you an edge over other investors).

One approach to this problem is to see what the value gurus are buying and imitate them. They do have a lot more resources than you have and if you can buy the same stocks they do in these faraway places at a cheaper price than they did, you may have an edge. OTOH, I don't like blindly following gurus as their goals, time horizon and asset allocation model may be radically inappropriate for my relatively tiny portfolio.

That said, I think there are a few gems that can be got for pennies on the dollar these days.

This Forbes article gives some Japanese examples of companies that are trading at or below their net liquid asset value.

l

Saturday, November 1, 2008

"Net-Net" bargains

In a net-net situation, an investor estimates a liquidation value for a company, then tries to pay a fraction of that value in the market. Ben Graham loved these types of situations, defining the net-net value as:

Cash and short-term investments + (0.75 * accounts receivable) + (0.5 * inventory) - total liabilities

Graham looked for companies whose market values were less than two-thirds of that net-net value, for two reasons. First, he wasn't sure he would receive the full value for accounts receivable and inventory before paying off the creditors. Second, he wanted to make sure he had a margin of safety to fall back on, in case it didn't work out. After all, if the market valued the company this low, something was certainly wrong with it.

Graham's idea was to bet on a situation with asymmetrical odds. In such situations, the probability of losing money is fairly high, but the magnitude of any loss would be small. However, the potential payoff is large, despite having a lower probability of success. That's why these situations are special and worth looking for, even today.





For some current equities who meet this criteria read here