Wednesday, February 27, 2008

More analysis on LM (Legg Mason)) by Dr. Paul Price

IMHO, a buy with an excellent margin of safety if < $70


Get a 'Legg' Up - Legg Mason - LM

February-27-2008

Legg Mason, Inc. [NYSE:LM] Feb 26 [10:30 AM price] $69.70
52-week range: $66.15 - 106.36 Yield = 1.38%

Legg Mason is a global asset management company. Through its subsidiaries it offers investment management to institutions, private investors, corporations and government entities. Branded units include Legg Mason Capital Management, Royce & Associates, and western Asset Manangement. As of March 2007 assets under management were $968.5 billion. They employ around 1350 financial advisors in 127 offices throughout the mid-Atlantic and mid-South regions of the United States.

Despite the present tough stock market environment LM is finishing its FY 2007 with what should be all-time record revenues and earnings. EPS for the FY ending March 31 are likely to cme in around $4.80/share up from $4.48 in FY 2006. Preliminary consensus estimates for FY 2008 revolve around $4.95/share.

Legg Mason has shown tremendous growth since 1994. EPS have grown dramatically from [split adjusted] $0.33 in FY 1994 to this year's $4.80. Dividends have increased from $0.11 annually to today's $0.96. Book Value/share has risen from $4.62 to over $53 during that same period.

Amazingly, Legg Mason shares are available today near their lowest absolute price point in almost three years! At the current quote of $69.70 LM shares are just over 14.5x trailing earnings despite the fact that EPS have shown a CAGR of 17.5% over the past 5 years. The dead low trades for 2005 - 2006 - 2007 were $68.10, $81.00 and $68.40 respectively.

There was an insider buy on Feb. 1 of 13,590 shares at $73.85/share.

Large instituitional holders [as of YE 2007]:

Dodge & Cox: 5.41%
FMR [Fidelity funds]: 3.81%
T.Rowe Price: 3.63%
Barclays Global: 3.28%
State Street: 3.11%
Vanguard Group: 3.05%
Third Avenue Mgt: 2.52% [Marty Whitman]
Goldman Sachs: 2.32%
Franklin Resources: 2.04%

Guru holders [not mentioned above]:

Robert Olstein
Jean-Marie Eveillard
Richard Snow
Brian Rodgers
Chris Davis
Ruane Cunndiff
Ron Baron

LM shares have typically traded with 'growth stock' multiples because of their stellar long-term numbers. Their 10-year median P/E has been 19x. Value Line is assuming an 18 P/E for their 3 - 5 year projections and I think that is a reasonably conservative way to go.

18 times FY 2008's estimate of $4.95 brings me to a target price of $89.10 or up 27.8% from the quote as I'm writing. Legg's dividend is 1.38% making for total return potential of close to 30% over the next 12 months.

Is this reasonable? LM shares hit peak prices of $129, $140 and $110.20 in 2005, 2006 and 2007 so investors have paid well higher than my goal price year after year [when fundamentals were not as good as they are today].

My expectations may end up being way too restrained based on those previous trading peaks in Legg Mason shares. Value Line notes that LM shares earned a 95th percentile ranking for stock 'price growth persistence' within their 1700 stock universe.

This month's focus

in my portfolio I'm focusing on looking for dips to add to positions in:

  1. AXP American Express-- one of the best companies for the long term now (big time insider buying also)
  2. LM Legg Mason (new CEO recently bought 1 M worth of stock)
  3. ORI Old Republic Insurance-- a conservative way to indirectly buy the monoline mortgage insurers eventual recovery without losing your stake if they go bust-- a very well managed high dividend paying company regardless
  4. HOG Harley Davidson (see this article)
  5. MCO Moody's
  6. BBSI Barrett's Business Services
  7. CKI.TO Clarke Inc.
  8. BAM.A.TO Brookfield Asset Management
  9. CSCO Cisco--- cash machine with massive market share
  10. KMX Car Max----extremely well managed Buffett pick with some recession potential
  11. DELL-- much maligned cash machine avoiding di-worse-ification despite lots of acquisitions.

I've covered all but ORI in previous posts. I'm hoping for some more ugliness to wash out in the market so I can get more of these real cheap. The uglier the better. I'm finding these short term stock rallies very annoying ;-)

I believe (as does Morningstar) that all these equities (except perhaps Clarke Inc.) are trading with at least a 30% margin of safety.

l

From Guru Focus.com-- consensus about the current investor's outlook

Gurus Think It Is a Great Time to Buy, Do You?

February-26-2008

The recent stock market decline certainly hurt a lot of investors, including some of our Gurus. But historically the best time to buy stocks is when many people are in fear. This is the review of what Gurus think about the current stock mark and opportunities.

Bruce Berkowitz: We have always been attracted to sectors showing large declining market values.

Bruce Berkowitz was largely unhurt by the credit crash and financial sector meltdown, as he did not own many financial stocks. His fund gained 12.35% vs. the S&P 500 Index performance of 5.49% (with dividends reinvested).

This is comment regarding the credit crunch: “Last year’s asset-backed securities 1 earthquake resulted from years of poor loan underwriting, residential builder overconfidence, and real estate speculation. The after-shocks continue to be felt, exaggerated by derivative securities piled on top of each other. Worldwide, financial institutions may ultimately write-off hundreds of billions and are being forced to raise equity to survive — if they can. Almost certainly, there will be high profile restructurings and continued stress.”

What does he think about the opportunities? “We have always been attracted to sectors showing large declining market values. Usually, stock prices of businesses within these industries drop faster than underlying values, tainted by the collapse of speculative securities. Such conditions create a Darwinian process of the strong getting stronger and the weak disappearing. The winners are usually run by battle-hardened owner/managers who know that the seeds of greatness are planted during the worst of times and reaped after the storms pass. To the victor belong the spoils”.

Bruce Berkowitz buys WellCare Health Plans Inc., The St. Joe Company. The Progressive Corp. The prices of these companies have hit multiyear lows and the industry is distressed.

For the complete stock picks of Bruce Berkowitz, go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Bruce+Berkowitz

David Winters: It is a great to buy if you have cash and do the work

David Winters’s Wintergreen Fund’s fund gained +21.13% in 2007. Winters invest heavily in international stocks. These days he sees a lot of opportunities, even in US.

In an interview with Bloomgerg, Winters says fortunes are made at time like this. “6 months ago, people were extremely optimistic, now they are fearful. If you do the work, and have cash, it is great time to go shopping. You got to buy wonderful merchandise at discount… We have deemphasized the US in the past years, but today there are great companies that on sale, just look at the 52-week low list.”

Watch David Winters video: http://www.executiveinterviews.com/U12198-wint-blus/

For the complete stock picks of David Winters , go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName= David+Winters

Dodge & Cox: Some of the best investment opportunities are created during periods of uncertainty.

2007 was the first year since 1999 in which the Dodge & Cox Stock Fund underperformed the S&P 500. The Fund returned 0.1% in 2007 compared to 5.5% for the S&P 500. Certainly seeing a lot of opportunities, Dodge & Cox reopened their fund to new investors.

Regarding to financial market decline, Dodge & Cox write in their shareholder letter: “Beginning in the third quarter, equity market volatility increased dramatically as investors began digesting what has seemed like a constant stream of negative news regarding the U.S. housing market, the Financials sector and the broader economy. A long-term investment horizon is particularly important in the face of volatility. In our experience, some of the best investment opportunities are created during periods of uncertainty.”

What Dodge & Cox are doing? “As valuations in the market and the Fund have dropped, our return outlook for the next three-to-five years has improved. At year end, the Fund’s forward price-toearnings ratio was 12.9 times compared to 16.3 times for the S&P 500. We are finding attractive investment opportunities and have lowered the Fund’s cash position to 1.3%. We also remain encouraged about the long-term prospects for the global economy. Despite the turmoil during the last six months of 2007 and the market’s downturn thus far in 2008, the forces of technological innovation and free market economic principles are creating unprecedented wealth in the developing world and compelling investment opportunities for the patient investor. We will continue to work hard to uncover these potential opportunities and counsel you to have patience and take a long-term view of investing in general.”

Dodge & Cox Buys Comcast Corp., Amgen Inc., Vulcan Materials Company, For the complete stock picks of Dodge & Cox , go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Dodge+%26+Cox

Mason Hawkins: The fourth quarter volatility gave long-term investors terrific opportunities to pursue

Mason Hawkins’s Longleaf Partners’ Fund lost 0.4% during 2007. He must be seeing a lot of opportunities as he reopened his fund to new investors.

About the recent economic issues and financial crisis, he wrote: “How long will these issues remain, and more importantly, are they properly reflected in stock prices? Stability will return at some point, although we have no ideas of the timing. The uncertainly of what the next six months will look like has Wall Street in knots. While we may appear stupid in the short run, our long-term time horizon and that of our partners gives us the luxury to act based on how business will look several years from now, not based on whether fear will grip markets next quarter.”

Regarding to opportunities, he wrote: “In the business we are buying, we believe short-term fears are more than reflected in the stock prices… This environment is not dissimilar to that of the fall of 2002, and as most of you remember, the aftermatch in 2003 was particularly rewarding.”

What is Mason Hawkins buying? Beaten down retailers and banks including Walgreen Company, Ltd. Brands Inc., The First American Corp etc. For the complete list, go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Mason+Hawkins

Wallace Weitz: We think this is a very good time for investing.

Wally Weitz had a bad year in 2007, his Value Fund lost 10.3%, as CountryWide was one of his largest holdings. He wrote: “We are glad that 2007 is history. The U.S. stock market showed a modest aggregate gain (S&P 500 +5.5%), but the market had a distinctly split personality. The housing, mortgage finance and consumer sector stocks were very weak, while others, seen as beneficiaries of booming Asian economies, were very strong. We were positioned squarely on the wrong side of the 2007 market and as a result, both our relative and absolute performance were poor.” Over past 20 years, Wally Weitz’s Value Fund outperformed the market by 1.4% a year.

Regarding the current environment, Weitz wrote: “In this environment, the stocks of companies with real problems have been punished severely. Unfortunately, the stocks of many other companies that have been impacted in minor or temporary ways have also been subject to heavy selling pressure. The potential rewards for successfully navigating this kind of market are great. However, to earn these rewards, investors must have the courage of their convictions so they can stick with their investments during extended periods of uncertainty. This can be painful... For those with the courage and patience to buy good assets when nobody else wants them or can afford to buy them, we think this is a very good time for investing. Terrific assets and companies with strong franchises are available at very attractive prices. We believe that it takes very little imagination to envision the possibility of 50% appreciation in most of our stocks over the next 2-3 years.”

Wally Weitz likes Berkshire Hathaway, AIG, American Express, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, etc. For the complete list, go to http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName= Wallace+Weitz

Bill Miller: I believe equity valuations in general are attractive now

After beating the S&P500 consecutively for 15 years, Bill Miller wrote “We had a bad 2007, which followed a bad 2006. Over this two-year span, we underperformed the S&P 500 by around 2000 basis points 2 , our worst showing since the two-year period 1989 and 1990, where we underperformed by 2500 basis points.”

However, he continues to wrote: ‘It is not an accident that our last period of poor performance was 1989 and

1990. The past two years are a lot like 1989 and 1990, and I think there is a reasonable probability the next few years will look like what followed those years.” In which he outperformed the market average by 15 consecutive years.

What does he think about the market: “Investors seem to be obsessed just now over the question of whether we will go into recession or not, a particularly pointless inquiry. The stocks that perform poorly entering a recession are already trading at recession levels. If we go into recession, we will come out of it. In any case, we have had only two recessions in the past 25 years, and they totaled 17 months. As long-term investors, we position portfolios for the 95% of the time the economy is growing, not the unforecastable 5% when it is not… I believe equity valuations in general are attractive now, and I believe they are compelling in those areas of the market that have performed poorly over the past few years. Traders and those with short attention spans may still be fearful, but longterm investors should be well rewarded by taking advantage of the opportunities in today’s stock market.”

Friday, February 22, 2008

Big Pharma with a Buffett twist

a quick note-- both GSK and SNY have drifted 10-15% below where Buffett bought them.

A full analysis later; however, I believe that this is an excellent long term buying opp. I have put bids in for a small number of shares of each for my personal RRSP.

Clarke Inc and the CEO George Armoyan: Corporate Raider of the North? A narrative analysis



Clarke Inc. is a small Canadian diversified catalyst/activist investing company predominated driven by a larger-than-life personality: CEO George Armoyan-- a man often compared to Carl Icahn. From a quantitative perspective, this company's balance sheet and growth makes it very attractive (remember to ignore the "sales" number-- this company profits from selling investments). On the other hand, the nature of its business and the undisclosed debt accumulation that must be present for all the recent aggressive share purchases makes the business very difficult to value.

Like many asset management companies I'm interested in (i.e. Legg-Mason, Brookfield Asset Management, Berkshire-Hathaway), the shareholder puts a disproportionate amount of trust/faith in the abilities of the management. This unlike some businesses where the margins are so fat and the competition so sparse that even a bunch of idiots can run the company and make a profit and often do (some infrastructure oriented companies fit the bill here). In this analysis it's important for a potential shareholder to understand the senior management's motivations, management skill and track record. This is why I'm taking the time to discuss Armoyan et al in more detail than usual. For entertaining reading, put his name on google and read what comes up. A Globe and Mail article here.

Mr. Armoyan is no stranger to controversy and litigation. He's taken on a premier and won in the past. The Nova Scotia SEC has investigated him at least once before (and found no security violations) and just yesterday the same organization has announced that it is investigating about a purported violation committed in 2005 in the Advanced Fiber Technologies Income Fund trade. I know that he has also been criticized for using Geosam Inc (a family trust) in his maneuvers such that a potential conflict of interest may exist between the shareholders of Clarke Inc. and Geosam. To Mr. Armoyan's credit is the fact that he immediately set up a third party trust admin for Geosam so it would operate at arm's length to him.

My take is that he is a hard-nosed value hound and isn't afraid to shake people up and bend the rules a bit to get his way. He is admired and sometimes hated by more than a few folks, particularly out East. His strategy is to find small to medium sized Canadian companies (often income trusts) that are struggling despite relatively strong balance sheets, considerable tangible assets and reasonable future prospects post turnaround. Clarke Inc and sometimes Geosam Inc (a holding company with his sons designated as beneficiaries) will buy 10-15% of the outstanding shares. Then he or one of his officers will ask nicely to be invited for a seat on the board of directors. If the company balks, then George forces a shareholder vote. Armoyan's reputation for creating shareholder value and crushing anything in his way usually precedes his coming, so shareholders wisely vote with him. Once he is in place, the firing and resignations begin. Costs are slashed and company is either turned around or liquidated or sold. George has been immensely successful in doing this. Two companies that he is in the process of doing this currently are Quebec's Shermag and Granby. Some of the Shermag story is in this CBC article.

The story behind this $200 M market cap company is reminiscent of the beginning of Berkshire Hathaway. BRK started off as a failing textile business that Buffett saw as a potential turnaround situation. He had retired from his partnership a few years prior (as he saw no investable companies in the mid to late 60's overheated market) but had become bored and was looking for a new challenge. After acquiring a controlling interest in the company he soon found that the competition was fierce and the margins were slim in that particular industry. After some attempts to restructure, he gradually shut down the textile business and diverted funds into investments--- predominantly in the area of his greatest expertise, insurance. The rest of BRK and Buffett's success is well known history.


Clarke Inc. started as a failing maritimes based trucking specializing in brokering North/South freight transport. In 2000/01 Armoyan and a friend started buying up stock, got onto the board and fired pretty much everybody. I believe he realized quite soon that the trucking part of the business wasn't going to perform to meet his goal of > 15% ROE. The charts on the top of the page tell the rest of the story (click on them to enlarge the graphics so you can read them). Clarke's recent acquisitions are well documented on Yahoo. Prior to Sept 2007 an excellent presentation of the companies' accomplishments is here.

As I mentioned above the numbers for Clarke are VERY impressive:

P/E of 4 (!!)
P/B 0.93 (!)
ROE of 36% (!!)
Current ratio of 6.6 (lots of cash to service debt, pay wages etc)
Debt:Equity 0.6 (double what I'd like to see)
Major insider ownership 42% ... 17% being the CEO's family
insider buying last 4 months
share buy back December ?amount
dividend 2% yield (not bad for a small cap company!)

These numbers need to be interpreted with caution. By the nature of the business, "one time sales" tend to skew the numbers for quarters in which they occur. With the downtrend in the Canadian market, Clarke is unlikely to be divesting any of their investments anytime soon. Some of the income trusts do provide cash flow to finance other projects and cover short term expenses.

The long term success of this company pretty much relies completely on the skill of the management. Despite being a micro/small cap company, the balance sheet suggests that bankruptcy is very unlikely even if a true recession strikes this country.

The share price has recently been beaten back from $10 to just above $6 (adjusted for share splits) due to the perception of high risk investments George is undertaking of late and the SEC announcement. I suspect Mr. Armoyan and the shareholders will be rewarded for the long term. I doubt the SEC issue will stick. I do suspect that the next couple of quarters will most likely show a decrease in EPS and the share price is likely to be punished disproportionately. Having said that, I feel that at the current price of $6, the risk:reward ratio is favourable.

I do own a disproportionate number of shares of CKI.TO in my portfolio acquired from $10-$7 in increments. I have a lowball bid in for $5.99/share that I hope will be filled over the next month.

l

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

BBSI Barrett Business Services Inc.

I've reviewed this US micro-cap HR/PEO outsourcing firm a few times before. As I gather more due digilence, I am more and more impressed with this company's prospects, particularly when the US economy eventually turns around.

I am always particularly cautious with small cap equities-- as I've mentioned before, they can be very risky and when things go poorly you can lose all your capital very quickly. The reward is usually proportionate to the risk and it is common for small companies like Barrett to increase their share price ten fold in five years or less (a "ten-bagger" thanks to Peter Lynch).

If you are still interested I strongly recommend listening to Bill Sheretz's webcast.

In addition to the analysis I've done previously in this blog, the key investment points include:

  1. Superb balance sheet and 23% 3 year average growth (dropping to 3% last year) --> we are seeing BBSI still remain profitable and completely debt free in a the worst operating environment for the last 17 years (mostly in California where the bulk of BBSI's work is)
  2. 3 new strategic acquisitions made in the last year, paid for in cash
  3. 90% employer retention rate, highest in the industry
  4. roughly 1/3 of the company's outstanding shares are owned by the CEO-- a man well known for his integrity and management skill (this is his competitor's opinion!).
  5. pays a 2% dividend (rare for a microcap) and makes regular share buy backs. This point and the above fact strongly aligns the management's interests with the shareholders and you should like that- a lot.
  6. US Gov't will need to tackle the "immigration problem". With demographics skewing to the elderly side of the population curve and a strong possibility that legislation will shut down the "illegals" employment supply, Barrett is positioned to grow rapidly in either case.
  7. an emphasis on scalability to attract organic growth and de-emphasize acquisitions (avoid "diworseification")
This is a solid, boring business that is easy to understand-- Lynch/Buffett mandatory requirement for all investments.

I put in a bid for a small quantity and hope to build on the position before the turn around occurs, whenever that will be.

l

A question about Buffet's recent purchases

Just in the last week (while I was away) Berkshire acquired a huge stake in Kraft and also added to his position in USB and Wells Fargo banks. He took on a new small (for him, anyway) position in Glaxo-Smith-Kline, a pharma company that I've been studying for a year or so now. These investments were registered with the SEC Dec 31, 2007.

The thing I find hard to understand is how he made the statement just a few weeks ago that he didn't find the current market particularly attractive from a valuation perspective, yet his cash flow suggests otherwise....

Can anyone explain this?