Wednesday, June 11, 2008

from Kiplinger

entertaining reading but the stocks described aren't the most attractive to me in the current conditions. They simply aren't cheap enough... except maybe MHK.... that one deserves a bit more research.


Stocks Buffett Would Love

He didn't ask us, but we found five great companies that fit his criteria.

By Elizabeth Ody

From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, July 2008

Warren Buffett's sweet tooth was old news long before he signed on as a partner in Mars's deal to buy Wrigley for $23 billion. Buffett bought See's Candies more than three decades ago for Berkshire Hathaway, the company he heads, and Dairy Queen is another prized possession. Coca-Cola and Kraft, the maker of Oreos, rank among Berkshire's largest stock holdings.

But judging by the jingle in his pocket, Buffett may be looking for a few more sweet deals. Berkshire had a bulging $35.6 billion in cash at the end of the first quarter. Subtracting its $6.5-billion commitment to the Wrigley buyout still leaves some $29.1 billion with which the master can indulge. So what kind of company does Buffett, who steered Berkshire from its 1965 share price of $15 to a mid-May price of $125,200, like to buy?

It takes more than empty calories to whet Buffett's appetite. He wants substantial companies, those with stock-market values between $5 billion and $20 billion. He likes companies with strong defenses, or "moats," around their businesses. Potential acquisitions must have a track record of generating superior returns on invested cash without taking on a lot of debt. And honest, level-headed leaders are a must because "Berkshire lets its businesses continue in the same successful manner with encouragement, not interference," as Buffett noted at Berkshire's annual shareholder meeting in May.

Buffett won't pay through the nose, but he'll pay extra to own the whole pie: In 2001, he shelled out 56% more than Shaw Industries' pre-deal share price to acquire the carpet maker.

Buffett hasn't asked for our help, but we've identified five companies to lighten his pocketbook. Even if he doesn't buy them, the stocks should appeal to mortals, too.

It's all about the blue box

Buffett knows a bit about bling. Berkshire owns three jewelry businesses, the best-known of which is Borsheims, an Omaha, Neb., jewelry store. So adding Tiffany & Co. to Berkshire's roster is hardly a stretch.

Tiffany's branding power is virtually unassailable. The company has been building the brand since its founding in New York City in 1837 -- the same year Tiffany introduced the blue box. "When customers buy a diamond ring, they don't really know the stone's value, so it's important that they buy from a trusted provider," says Larry Coats, co-manager of Oak Value fund. "Tiffany is able to charge a premium price for a comparable product because of that."

The little blue box has exported well. Tiffany, which generates 38% of its revenues in 17 foreign lands, added 11 overseas stores in the fiscal year that ended January 31 (it operates 192 stores worldwide). Company spokesman Mark Aaron says Tiffany is on target to add 20 international stores in 2008, including its first shops in Belgium, Ireland and Spain.

At home, the company is balancing its highbrow image with more-affordable products. A new format of smaller "Tiffany Collections" stores will carry only merchandise that sells for $15,000 or less (regular Tiffany stores carry items that cost up to $1 million). The first store will open this October in Glendale, Cal.

Despite weakness in the retailing sector, Tiffany reported a 29% boost in earnings, to $2.33 per share, and an 11% rise in sales, to $2.9 billion, in the fiscal year that ended January 31. At a mid-May price of $42, the stock (symbol TIF) trades for 16 times the $2.72 per share that analysts, on average, estimate the company will earn in the current fiscal year.

Strong moat, huge float

Get to know Paychex and you'll start to think you've died and gone to Buffett heaven. Businesses outsource their payrolls to Paychex (PAYX), which cuts checks and charges a fee per check -- a bit like the "tollbooth" business model that Buffett favors. Another peculiar Buffettism? Like Berkshire's core insurance business, Paychex makes money off the "float" -- in its case, the money that its clients send to Paychex for paying salaries. Between the time it receives the money and the time it disburses it, Paychex can invest the money.

The Rochester, N.Y., company takes 10% of the payroll-services market, putting it in second place, behind Automatic Data Processing. But Paychex dominates the market for small-to-midsize businesses; 81% of its clients employ fewer than 20 people. "They are the go-to people in the small-to-midsize market," says Matthew Gershuny, an analyst for the Parnassus funds. That not only grants Paychex a defensible niche, it also grants dibs on much of the remaining unclaimed market. "A large portion of the unclaimed market is in the under-ten-employee segment," says chief financial officer John Morphy. Paychex has also been expanding into complementary services -- such as workers' compensation administration and 401(k) record-keeping -- that it can market to its 561,000 existing clients.


If the numbers offer any clues, Paychex's defenses are strong. Client retention is at an all-time high, and two-thirds of the company's new business comes from referrals. "Payrolls are not something companies like to switch often, because if there's one thing you can't screw up, it's paying your employees correctly and on time," says Morningstar analyst Joel Bloomer. Morphy says the company has been able to raise prices by 3% to 4% in each of the past 25 years without encountering much resistance from clients.

Paychex, which is debt-free, has generated record sales and profits in each of the past 17 years. At $36, the stock carries a market value of $13 billion and trades for 21 times estimated profits of $1.70 per share for the fiscal year that ends in May 2009. The shares yield an above-average 3.3%.

They've got it covered

Competing against Berkshire's own Shaw Industries, Mohawk Industries is one-half of a duopoly in the flooring business. "Buffett would love to buy Mohawk but most likely couldn't" because of antitrust concerns, says Bruce Berkowitz, co-manager of Fairholme fund. But that shouldn't deter you from picking up a few Mohawk shares.

Mohawk is actually a nose ahead of Shaw. Mohawk's chief financial officer, Frank Boykin, says the most recent figures show Mohawk with 24% of the U.S. flooring market, which includes hardwoods, carpet and tile, compared with 21% for Shaw. And Mohawk is better diversified, with a major presence in every type of flooring.

Management has deftly snatched up some smaller companies to gain that edge. In 2005, Mohawk, headquartered in Calhoun, Ga., acquired Belgium's Unilin, the global leader in laminate flooring. Other recent acquisitions include Dal-Tile, a maker of ceramic and stone tile, and hardwood manufacturer Columbia Flooring.

The housing crunch has bruised business. Sales fell 4% in 2007, to $7.6 billion. Earnings in the first quarter of 2008 sank 23%, to 95 cents per share, from the year-earlier period. But only 15% of sales come from new residential construction, the segment hardest hit by the housing downturn; another 25% comes from new commercial construction and 60% from replacement business. At $76, the stock (MHK) is off 27% from its 52-week high and trades for 14 times estimated 2008 profits of $5.41 per share. But as Buffett recently said, "The lower things go, the more interesting things get."

Utterly predictable

You know what you'll find when you walk into a Bed Bath & Beyond store, and therein lies the company's strength. Other than rival Linens 'n Things, whose parent company recently filed for bankruptcy reorganization, "there's no company that offers the same level of selection," says Eric Schoenstein, co-manager of Jensen Portfolio.

Smart management of inventory has been a key reason for the Union, N.J., company's success. "Not only do you know what the stores purport to offer you, you know it'll be in the stores," says Peter Sapino, an analyst for the Weitz funds. Store managers have a high degree of independence in deciding which items to stock so they can better serve their clientele. For instance, some New York City stores sell window fans in the winter, catering to renters who don't have control over the heating in their apartments.

BB&B hasn't been immune to the housing slowdown. Profits per share dipped 2%, to $2.10, in the fiscal year that ended March 1. At $32, the stock (BBBY) trades at 18 times estimated profits of $1.82 per share for the year that ends next March.

But the company's leaders aren't the kind to sit back and whine about a weak economy. BB&B plans to open 50 to 55 new stores in the U.S. and Canada in fiscal 2008, as well as remodel and expand existing stores. With no debt on its balance sheet and its chief rival struggling, there's nothing holding the company back.

All nuts and bolts

Take a look at Berkshire's core businesses -- insurers, furniture stores, restaurants -- and you'll notice Buffett's penchant for the boring-yet-reliable. Well, it doesn't get much more boring than nuts and bolts, which just so happens to be Fastenal's bread and butter.

But Fastenal has built a daunting presence in its humble niche of industrial and construction supplies. The Winona, Minn., company has more than 2,100 stores in the U.S. and Canada. Fastenal offers ten product lines, from threaded fasteners -- the core product throughout Fastenal's 41-year history -- to pneumatic power equipment. Tally it up and it comes to 800,000-plus products.

Growth has been remarkable. From 1998 through 2007, the debt-free company's revenues expanded at an 18% annualized clip, and profits per share rose at a 19% pace. At $50, the stock (FAST) trades for a rich 26 times 2008 earnings estimates of $1.91 per share.

The company is striving to improve profitability. In July 2007, Fastenal announced a plan to slow new-store growth, from 14% per year to between 7% and 10%, and to invest the savings in extra salespeople. Chief executive Willard Oberton says he's happy with the results so far, as first-quarter revenues climbed 16% and profits rose 26% from the year-earlier period.

Would the nuts-and-bolts retailer ever want to join the Berkshire fold? "We like being independent, and close to 20% of the company is owned by the founders," Oberton says. He doubts that the parsimonious Buffett would offer a big-enough premium to persuade the founders to sell. But who knows? The market values Fastenal's shares at $7.4 billion. Even if Buffett paid $10 billion, he'd still have nearly $20 billion left for other deals.

Buffett's menu

You'll find a lot of financial stocks and a number of steady growth companies, such as Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble, among Berkshire's biggest holdings. But you won't find any tech stocks -- not even Microsoft, whose chairman, Bill Gates, is a bridge-playing buddy of Buffett's. Reason: Buffett doesn't invest in companies he doesn't understand.

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY'S BIGGEST HOLDINGS
Company Symbol Shares held (in millions) Value (in billions)
American Express AXP 151.6 $7.4
Anheuser-Busch BUD 35.6 1.8
Burlington Northern Santa FeBNI 60.8 6.3
Coca-ColaKO 200.0 11.2
ConocoPhillipsCOP 17.5 1.6
Johnson & JohnsonJNJ 64.3 4.3
Kraft FoodsKFT 124.4 3.9
Moody's Corp.MCO 48.0 1.9
PoscoPKX 3.5 2.2
Procter & GamblePG 101.5 6.6
Sanofi-AventisSNY 17.2 1.3
TescoTESO 227.3 1.9
U.S. BancorpUSB 75.2 2.5
USG Corp.USG 17.1 0.6
Wal-Mart StoresWMT 19.9 1.1
Washington PostWPO 1.7 1.1
Wells FargoWFC 303.4 8.9
White Mountains Insurance GroupWTM 1.7 0.8
Values of stocks based on share prices to May 12. SOURCES: 2007 annual report, Yahoo

The Oracle of Omaha speaks in the Great White North

Mr. Buffett muses about markets around the world

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

SNY Sanofi-Aventis at 52 week low today

This premium, European based health care company is unrealistically cheap. It represents a rare opportunity to engage in a low risk/high return investment IMHO.

I've reviewed SNY in detail previously. It has one of the most attractive pipelines in the industry. It is currently trading at 1.3 book value (!) and a forward P/E multiple of 7 (!!). Dividend yield is 3.1%

The company is a significant holding of Warren Buffett and many other gurus with a value orientation.

The downside risk is the potential for increasing regulation from the incumbent US administration. I think that this concern is overblown. SNY has thrived in the European environment at any rate. The D:E ratio is slightly higher than comps; however, the extremely high operating cash flow (9 billion Euros/y) is allowing the company to aggressively pay down the 7 B euros of long term debt.

Morningstar gives the equity 5 stars and a fair market value of $50/share. It is currently trading at $33 and change, providing a 34% margin of safety.

I own some shares in my RRSP and will happily add to the position at $33/share or below.

Note that Mr. Buffett has advised that a basket of health care stocks should be held in a portfolio because product pipelines are difficult to predict. This is an exception to his usual concentrated asset allocation strategy.

Monday, June 9, 2008

MUST READ

Vitaliy Katsenelson's presentation on valuation in range bound markets along with an analysis of Jos A. Bank Clothiers, a deep contrarian pick.

Brilliant, IMHO.

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Hamburger, anyone?


I'm shamelessly stealing an investment idea from an insightful Canadian investor, Randy McDuff. He has 2 portfolios registered on Marketocracy.com that perform in the top ten--- and he has VERY high powered competition. He regularly contributes to an investment newsletter that I subscribe to.

I read his bull pitch about the company "Hamburger Hafen und Logistik" HHULF.PK a few weeks again in Investor's Digest. You can read the highlights as he presented it (for free) here. A very informative presentation about the company, its corporate structure and its financial performance metrics is available in english here.

HHLA is a company that operates through four segments: Container, Intermodal, Logistics, and Real Estate. The Container segment operates container terminals that handle containers, 56% of which come from Asia. The Intermodal segment offers rail, road, and sea transport network linking German seaports to the hinterlands as well as north and central Europe. It also organizes feeder services with Finland and Russia from Lubeck. The Logistics segment combines various special services in the consultancy, special cargo handling, and storage logistics fields. The Real Estate segment develops projects for logistics premises and office properties.

Note: the real estate segment has spun off from the other 3 Jan 08 and is owned solely by the city of Hamburg, so it should be ignored by potential investors when analyzing the financials.

The company was founded in 1885 as Hamburger Freihafen-Lagerhaus-Gesellschaft and changed its name to Hamburger Hafen-und Lagerhaus-Aktiengesellschaft in 1939. Later, it changed its name to Hamburger Hafen und Logistik Aktiengesellschaft in 2005. The initial public offering was in November 2007 at 53 Euros. The company is based in Hamburg, Germany.

This isn't a conventional investment and I like that. I'll explore the upside and downside of owning a part of this business.

Here's what attracted me to this company:

  • hard asset and infrastructure play--- chance of bankruptcy virtually nil.
  • leveraged to emerging markets growth without actually be located in those countries (I think that the people in India and China are fantastic, I just don't trust their governments and I don't think the financial reports coming out of those places are worth the paper they are printed on.)
  • virtual monopoly. The only real competition for access of goods to central/north Europe is the Port of Rotterdam. This allows the company to pass along capital cost increases to the customers i.e. if oil keeps spiking like it has been.
  • excellent free cash flow (increasing 100% from 2006 to 2007) allowing Capex/infrastructure improvements to be self-financed
  • German corporate tax reform (i.e. a significant DECREASE in corp tax rates) to the company's short and long term advantage
  • improving cost controls (German efficiency!)
  • cheapest large publically traded port in the world. Trades at 12 x EV/EBIDTA.
  • carefully designed growth and expansion plan in place (see presentation above for details)
  • impressive profitability that has improved year over year. Return on Capital 23% ROE 29% increasing yoy. EBIDTA margins increasing yoy to 32.4% as the higher margin container business makes up a larger component of revenue.
  • largely undiscovered by the investment community in North America. Do a google search and search all the usual investment websites-- see how much you can find out about it! Not much internet chatter and no analyst interest yet.
  • is a boring, predictable, slowly changing business with easily projected cash flows and is easy to understand. Benjamin Graham and W. Buffett would approve, I think.
  • excellent liquidity Current ratio just under 2 Quick ratio 1.7
  • My discounted cash flow calculation yields an intrinsic value of 6B euros v.s. a current market value of 4 B euros. I think that it easily deserves an enterprise multiple of 15-18 x versus 12 today. This approx 50% discount to fair market value provides an excellent margin of safety for this investment. I suspect that the current "oil shock" situation may provide an impetus for the share price to drop below current levels and make it even more of a bargain.
  • Dividend yield is currently 1.6% and management commitment is to increase this on a regular basis by paying out 50% of profits annually in dividends.

Now, the down side:

  • trades "over the counter" OTC or pink sheets in North America, very significantly impairing liquidity of this investment. This may or may not change in the future if management decides to list the company on a major North American stock exchange. Most investors are justifiably scared of investing in pink sheet/OTC companies and for good reason: they are usually tiny companies or enterprises with horrible credit records. Obviously HHLA doesn't fit in this group, but beware-- this investment should be designated for the very long term i.e. in a RRSP.
  • Vunerable to a global recession. As with all recessions, this should be temporary but would adversely affect the share price.
  • Currency risk i.e. most experts feel that the Euro is currently overvalued and the USD may be undervalued. A correction could impair future profits.
  • Capex intensive-- labour costs, maintenance of the port, equipment etc.
  • management's ability and integrity is difficult to judge from a North American vantage point. Executive scandals cloud several German companies lately, diminishing investor confidence. German securities rules and shareholder protection legislation is unfamiliar to most investors.

I think that HHULF.PK is definitely worth further study. As I've said above, I suspect it will get slightly cheaper over the course of the summer. I plan to put in a bid for a relatively small amount of shares at 50 euros and hopefully add to the position over time. I strongly suspect that Mr. McDuff is correct in his prediction that revenues in the expanded physical plant of the Port of Hamburg will double in the next 4 years, with the share price likely to follow. I also suspect that the more mainstream investment community will discover the stock before long and this may be a catalyst for share price appreciation.

Friday, June 6, 2008

The Big Sell off may be beginning

As I anticipated recently, the bear market rally has been crushed today and may well carry on for awhile, providing some great bargains for great companies.

I'm watching the following very carefully:

  • LYG (actually my bid was filled today at $29.50 but I'd buy more with the 13% yield)
  • MKL (have a bid in for $399)
  • HHULF.PK This is a logistics/real estate/container handling company that operates the Port of Hamburg. More on this intriguing opportunity later.
  • BBSI
  • MCO
  • AEO
  • LM
  • AXP


I've sold GGC for a considerable loss and am fascinated to see that the price/share actually went UP today when almost every other quality company has taken a dive. GGC is teetering on the brink of bankruptcy and is just edging it's debt covenants. Go figure.

When to sell your stocks

I find this the most difficult topic in investing. Phil Fisher's masterpiece book, "Common Stocks, Uncommon Profits" has been very helpful to me.

One of Joe Ponzio's Best Articles Ever on When to Sell

Joe summarizes Mr. Fisher's concepts so that you don't need to buy the book.